Lockout deez

So, it looks like the NBA owners are going to lock out the players since both sides failed to reach a new collective bargaining agreement.  It is shame because the NBA is quite the popular sports these days with a bunch of talent in the league and the best team to root against with the Miami Heat.  It sucks for the fans but f*ck the owners. 

I get the fact that most franchises are losing money but that is on them.  Their owners should go one themselves for being idiots.  I mean they been b*tching about losing money and bad contracts and what not and then the Blazers go offer bum ass Greg Oden $8.8 million qualifying offer to stay in Portland.  WTF!!!  This fragile bastard has played in only 82 games since his 07-08 rookie season.  Two micro fracture surgeries on BOTH knees and a broken kneecap and you think Mr. Glass deserves that dough.  When he was healthy it was not like he was a world beater anyway.  The Blazers are much better offering me the league minimum to play center for them.  Both of my knees work and I am muuuch cheaper and I will actually be able to play in the games that I am getting paid for. 

How are you going to make ANOTHER bad contract move then want some people to feel bad for you that you are losing money.  I mean they are going to try and paint the players as the bad guys for making all this money they don't deserve but that is on the owners.  If I am the 4th best player on the team and you want to pay me #1 player money please believe that I will be taking ALL of the loot.  Take the Chicago Bulls when they lost to the Heat in conference finals, people were saying they needed another scorer.  Well, the last damn time I checked Luol Deng was playing in a 80 million dollar contract.  Carlos Boozer is making like 11 million a year or something asinine.  What do you mean they don't have another scorer.  These sons of biotches are getting paid like they should be averaging 25 points a game so that is your second scorer right there.  All I know is that Kevin Durant and Elton Brand should not be paid the same thing. 

Screw all the owners for making this mess and wanting somebody else to clean it up!!

More advice!!!

DEAR ABBY: My wife had an unhappy five-year marriage to her high-school boyfriend. They divorced when their son, "Noah," was 20 months old. Then she met me, and we have been married for 34 happy years.

I adopted Noah with the consent of his birth father, who also remarried and had a family. My wife and I added a daughter to ours.

I was aware that Noah had re-established contact with his birth father and half siblings. We supported it. But we were blindsided when Noah told us he plans to take back his original surname. He says it isn't "personal," but he wants his children to have their "rightful" name and know their "true" lineage.

Abby, we are hurt and confused. This has caused a painful rift in the family. Please help.

- Noah's Real Dad in New York

Listen, big guy, let it go.  I know it does suck that your "son" wants to change his last name back to his REAL last name.  I get it you raised this young gunner as he was your own kid, let him eat you out of house and home, paid all those bills.  This is exactly why you should have read my previous post about not raising other people's kids.  You are hurt and have the right to be.  I mean you adopted the lil bastard when he was 20 months old so it was not like he could tell you he did not want your simple last name.  So it really is not personal and made his own decision.  Which brings me to my next point.

I am not a mathematician by any means but doing the math Noah is a 30 something grown a** man.  I need you to let this grown a** man make grown a** decisions. At this age he is probably out of your his house, maybe has a wife and some kids.  You work on enjoying retirement and if you really want another son pop a Viagra and go find a young woman who needs a Sugar Daddy.  

Advice Hour

 I was reading an advice column/article thing on www.philly.com and decided to give my take on it.

DEAR ABBY: Because my 90-year-old mother is homebound, she qualifies for a meal program through a senior charity service. The program is free of charge for those in need. She didn't like some of the meals, so she asked me to give them to my father-in-law, "Louis."

Louis is 88. He still drives and is well-off, so he doesn't qualify for the program, but he accepted the meals that were offered. My mother has now decided she can no longer eat any of these meals, so I told her we should discontinue the program.

When I mentioned it to my wife, she became very upset with me, saying her father appreciated those meals. I reminded her that her father is able to drive himself to the supermarket and buy frozen dinners similar to what is being provided through the service. My wife is so angry she now says she will never again share any leftovers with my mother. It's an understatement to say this situation has created a major fight between us.

Is my wife correct in being upset about my discontinuing the meal service?

- Charity Begins at Home

 No, your wife is a f*cking nutcase and you should pay her no mind in whatever bullsh*t that is coming out of her mouth. Do not argue with her she is clearly off her rocker.  You are completely right in this situation and discontinuing the service is the right thing to do.  Keeping that program alive is what we call stealing.  Inform your wife of this please.  I am pretty sure that this free program is coming out of some taxes or some other b.s. that the working man is unwittingly paying for.

Now, this is the most important part sir so listen up.  The next time you see your wife...wait for it...slap her!!  She will be shocked on why you did this to her.  That was for your Mom.  If my future wife would ever say anything simple about my Mother like that there would be consequences and repercussions.  

In closing thank you for having some tact and class.  I really do appreciate it.  Tell your wife her leftovers sucks a** anyways.  However, I do hope you are not a pedophile because your wife is pretty childish!!

Eff Yo Village!!

Been a long time since I have posted something up here.  Almost two months in a week or so.  For all of the time I was absent I was in the heart of my anger management study and wanted to give my best effort to finishing that honestly. (giggles)  I will now try to get back into the swing of things.

I was out at a function a few days ago and the quote "It takes a village to raise a child" was thrown out there.  When I first heard this quote all I could do was laugh and roll my eyes at that nonsense.  As I have gotten older I have come to really dislike that quote and want to burn that motherf*cking village down!!  Too often I find that quote leads to piss poor and lazy a*& parenting. 

People already know that I am no fan of taking care of other people's children.  Many years ago I was at a National conference for a student organization and the head of the organization let his 2 year old son just run all over the place.  He commented on how somebody asked if he was not afraid that anything would happen to his child and he answered with this: " Why should I be?  He is amongst thousands of his brothers and sisters" *sideways face*   F*ck out of here!!  That is that dumb thinking that will get your son snatched, have you crying on the news saying that you just want your son back.  To automatically think that somebody has the same interest in your child is very naive and stupid.

In a nut shell raise your own freaking kids and stop expecting/wanting somebody else to.  We may live in the same neighborhood but chances are I am not looking out for your kids.  Just tell them bastards to stay away from my car!!

I don't have enough spit to put that fire out!!